Start your ESG journey today with Presgo
Talk to an ESG ExpertThe Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) gives companies a framework grounded in actual climate science for setting and reporting emissions. These science-based targets are measurable, credible, and validated goals that show how much and how quickly a company needs to cut GHG emissions to achieve the global net zero target. This page breaks down what the SBTi is, how companies benefit from adopting it, and why it has become the global benchmark for corporate net-zero.
Understand where your existing disclosures meet framework requirements and where gaps still exist
"*" indicates required fields
Our local ESG Experts are on-hand to understand your ESG Reporting needs and cater our solution to you. Get in touch to discuss how we can help.
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) is a climate action organisation that develops science-based global standards and guidance for companies and institutions that set greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets. It has become a crucial benchmark for companies with net-zero plans aligned with the Paris Agreement’s ambition of keeping global warming levels at 1.5°C.
The SBTi was created in 2014, through a partnership among the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), the UN Global Compact (UNGC), the World Resources Institute (WRI), and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). Previously, no standard held existing corporate climate pledges accountable. Companies could set any target and face little to no evaluation and careful examination. The SBTi was built to establish a scientific baseline, yet now, it sits at the centre of corporate climate target-setting.
The SBTi itself develops the scientific and sector-specific standards, while the independent validation arm, SBTi Services, checks submitted targets against those standards before allowing publication. This distinction matters because it separates rule setting from target validation, which helps protect the credibility of the entire process.
Science-based targets are simply GHG reduction goals that conform to and apply climate science. These targets are specific and quantifiable, following the latest science necessary to meet net-zero goals.
SBTi targets usually cover these scope emissions:
With those scopes, SBTi targets specify company commitments with numbers and deadlines. Examples of these targets are:
For many companies, scope 3 is often where the real weight of emissions exists. Supply chain emissions can account for over 90% of the overall carbon footprint, and this is also where supplier data can get complicated.
With science-based targets, SBTi companies test their understanding of their value chain and how they can effectively reduce their emissions. The SBTi has developed structured approaches to address these issues, from engaging suppliers to setting emission targets per material or commodity.
Companies undergo changes, experience risks, and continue to better their position and growth in the market. Science-based targets are there to help in the process for these reasons:
The effects of the environment and climate change are serious, ongoing and long-term business risks. Flooding, heatwaves, drought, and supply disruptions affect operations, insurance, sourcing, transport costs, and financial performance. Science-based targets address these issues within the business and as a continuous contribution to global net-zero.
On the positive side, the SBTi’s data in 2025 shows that among 171 SBTi-validated companies, 91% saw a positive overall business impact. 95% of the companies also reported stronger reputation benefits, which is all the more reason a growing number of companies are validating their net-zero targets with the SBTi.
The 2025 SBTi research shows that the centre of growth is shifting. China, Japan, and India led proportional growth among major markets, followed by Singapore, Pakistan, and Indonesia, appearing among the fastest-growing markets. Healthcare, materials, and information technology were the fastest-growing sectors by proportion.
Frameworks like the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) now require companies to explain how their climate targets align with the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement. SBTi validation is the most recognised way to demonstrate alignment with both auditors and investors.
The growth of major markets also serves as a useful signal for Asian businesses and globally, with climate target-setting going beyond compliance in EU countries and the SBTi’s continuous development of its Corporate Net-Zero Standard.
The SBTi has continuously scaled over the past decade and has become a widely used framework. These are the SBTi’s key milestones:
As of the latest data, around 13,400 SBTi companies have developed science-based targets, and more than 10,800 have validated targets. 2,529 of these companies have net-zero targets.
SBTi’s core goal is to help companies reduce emissions effectively through science and at the pace needed to reach net-zero by 2050. This aligns with the Paris Agreement and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment of the impacts and the direction needed to meet the 1.5°C global limit. This all means targets must cover real emissions cuts, aiming for rapid reduction, where carbon credits alone cannot replace the work of cutting emissions across operations, electricity use, suppliers, logistics, and product use.
The SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard gives companies a framework for setting science-based net-zero targets.
Under the current SBTi approach, companies need near-term and long-term targets. These near-term targets push for emissions cuts in the next five to ten years. Long-term targets show how the business should move toward net-zero by 2050.
SBTi is now revising the Corporate Net-Zero Standard. The second consultation’s draft of Version 2.0 was released in November 2025. Under the standard, companies must:
Given that it is still in its draft form, the standard’s timeline follows this timeline:
The SBTi guidance and methodology involve real emissions measurement across the three scopes, internal governance, and external review. The process runs through five steps, with the technical work sitting mostly in the first two.
A company may submit a formal commitment to the SBTi Services to set a science-based target. For some businesses, this step sends a public signal before they validate the target. Although this step is not always required, companies that are ready to submit can move directly to validation.
The company builds its targets using SBTi standards, sector guidance, and calculation tools. This stage is where the bulk of the work sits, as the company must define boundaries, calculate emissions, assess scope 3 relevance, and decide what reductions are credible. That means companies need to set their science-based targets with these steps and criteria.
The company’s targets are submitted through the SBTi Services validation process. SBTi Services reviews whether the targets meet the applicable criteria, and if the target does not meet the standard, the company will need to revise it.
Once validated, the company can publicly announce its targets. This should be done carefully, as claims should match the validation status and avoid overstating what has been achieved.
A validated target is not proof that a company has decarbonised, but it does prove that the target has passed the SBTi review.
Companies need to report progress each year. Annual disclosure requires clean data, repeatable workflows, and clear evidence. A spreadsheet-heavy process can become a problem once the organisation scales.
Science-Based Targets initiative emissions reporting does not end once targets have been validated. As companies pursue their net-zero efforts and annual disclosures, the risk remains that data quality and reported progress may weaken over time to withstand external review.
Presgo is an AI-native ESG reporting software built to handle that continuous work and address long-term performance. It automates data collection and analysis, narrative generation, and report building and provides expert support and SBTi guidance. Presgo connects scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions data to the audit trails and reporting structures SBTi requires, especially for its Corporate Net-Zero Standard.
Presgo’s customisable solutions for SBTi reporting include:

Calculate scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions using verified factors and regional sources, ensuring complete data for SBTi reporting.

Centralise emissions data across teams and business units, with anomaly detection that flags inconsistencies before they become a reporting problem.

Collect emissions and sustainability data from suppliers through configurable surveys, especially with scope 3, where most companies struggle.

Draft and score narrative sections for completeness before publication, catching the gaps and missed errors.
With configurable ESG solution modules, Presgo’s technology supports your company in creating a science-based target management system on your own terms.